https://www.jakartajournals.net/index.php/oajjhs <p><strong>Open Access Jakarta Journal of Health Sciences (OAJJHS)</strong> is a peer review scientific journal published by CV Alkahf Digital Inovasi, Jakarta - Indonesia. OAJJHS establish in 2021, with pISSN 2798-2033; eISSN 2798-1959.</p> <p><strong>OAJJHS</strong> is published periodically thrice a year (February, July and Oktober). Open Access Jakarta Journal of Health Sciences is intended provide for dissemination of original and quality research on various topic in health, nursing, pharmacy, midwifery, etc.</p> Sagamedia Indo Press en-US Open Access Jakarta Journal of Health Sciences 2798-2033 https://www.jakartajournals.net/index.php/oajjhs/article/view/521 <p><strong>Latar Belakang: </strong>Lingkungan kerja perkantoran yang tidak ergonomis berpotensi meningkatkan risiko gangguan muskuloskeletal dan menurunkan kenyamanan serta kesehatan kerja. Evaluasi ergonomi diperlukan sebagai bagian dari penerapan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3).</p> <p><strong>Tujuan:</strong> Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kondisi ergonomi lingkungan kerja perkantoran pada <em>Fungsi General Affairs</em> di PT X menggunakan metode <em>Ergonomic Checklist</em>.</p> <p><strong>Metode:</strong> Penelitian ini merupakan studi deskriptif observasional dengan unit analisis berupa 132 sub-aspek ergonomi yang dikelompokkan dalam 9 aspek ergonomi. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi langsung menggunakan <em>Ergonomic Checklist</em>, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif.</p> <p><strong>Hasil:</strong> Hasil penilaian menunjukkan bahwa 71 sub-aspek (53,8%) berada pada kategori Baik, 14 sub-aspek (10,6%) Tidak sesuai, dan *47 sub-aspek (35,6%) Tidak diterapkan (N/A). Ketidaksesuaian paling banyak ditemukan pada aspek postur dan posisi kerja.</p> <p><strong>Kesimpulan:</strong> Penerapan ergonomi di lingkungan kerja perkantoran <em>Fungsi General Affairs</em> PT X secara umum sudah cukup baik, namun masih diperlukan perbaikan terutama pada aspek postur dan posisi kerja guna meningkatkan keselamatan dan kenyamanan kerja.</p> Mitha Erlisya Puspandhani Roni Iryadi Sony Fitriawan Imbara Copyright (c) 2025 Mitha Erlisya Puspandhani, Roni Iryadi, Sony Fitriawan Imbara https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 2025-11-30 2025-11-30 4 11 1 9 10.53801/oajjhs.v4i11.521 https://www.jakartajournals.net/index.php/oajjhs/article/view/522 <p><strong>Background: </strong>Pronunciation plays a crucial role in oral communication and classroom instruction, particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts where lecturers function as primary language models for students. Inaccurate pronunciation by lecturers may influence learners’ phonological awareness and speech production.</p> <p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze and compare pronunciation errors produced by an experienced English lecturer and a novice English lecturer, with a particular focus on consonant pronunciation in an EFL setting.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research employed a descriptive comparative case study design. Two English lecturers (one experienced and one novice) participated as cases. Data were collected through a pronunciation test consisting of 70 English words, read aloud by each participant and audio-recorded. Pronunciation accuracy was assessed based on a predetermined phonemic target using standard IPA transcription. Errors were identified and categorized according to consonant error types, and results were analyzed descriptively using frequency counts and error rates.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that the experienced lecturer produced 7 pronunciation errors out of 70 tokens (10.0%), while the novice lecturer produced 12 errors (17.1%). Common error patterns involved fricative and dental consonants, including substitutions such as /v/→/f/ and /θ/→/t/. Although both lecturers demonstrated generally acceptable pronunciation performance, the novice lecturer showed a higher frequency of consonant errors than the experienced lecturer.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that teaching experience may be associated with lower pronunciation error rates, particularly in consonant production. However, given the limited sample size, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further research with larger samples and more varied speech tasks is recommended to better understand pronunciation performance among EFL lecturers and its implications for language instruction.</p> Siti Fatimah Teni Hadiyani Kurnihayati Kurnihayati Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Fatimah, Teni Hadiyani, Kurnihayati https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 2025-11-30 2025-11-30 4 11 10 16